Free考研资料

标题: 四六级考试之阅读理解分析（仔细看，有理有据，阅读无压力~） [打印本页]

作者: 徐胜 时间: 13-12-4 22:09
标题: 四六级考试之阅读理解分析（仔细看，有理有据，阅读无压力~）

准备工作

1，做题前，标段落，对解题会很有用（细节，或者说是态度）

2，做题时间，我的时间一直都是7分钟每篇，大家一开始可能会不适应，可以平时每篇10分钟，开始做的时候保证正确率，但也不能多的离谱，用30分钟就过了。

3，读题目：怎么读题目？看题目怎么问的，一些关键词要划出来，便于做题。

4，基本是每道题目对应一个段落（有的是1~2段，这个我们具体再说）

5，注意划出一些感情色彩的词语（情感,否定肯定,转折等：not always,seldom,But，however，of course，certainly...)

6,题目做的不在多，在于精，举一反三，多反省，分析。

读题目

56. What is the finding of the Global Humanitarian Forum（全球人道主义论坛）?

A) Rates of death from illnesses have risen due to global warming.

B) Global temperatures affect the rate of economic development.

C) Malnutrition has caused serious health problems in poor countries.

D) Economic trends have to do with population and natural disasters.

我们首先就把题目中的关键词（finding，Global Humanitarian Forum) 在原文中找出来，也就是我强调的 “定位”，只要定位准了，题目大多数就出来了，也就是说“有理有据”。

57. What do we learn about the Forum’s report from the passage?

A) It caused a big stir in developing countries.

B) It was warmly received by environmentalists.

C) It aroused a lot of interest in the scientific circles.

D) It was challenged by some climate and risk experts

我强调的关键词！我们立刻回文章中找Forum’s report，确定答题区间。

好了，就说这么多了，大家一看就懂得。

读选项

58. What does Dr. P i e l k e say about the Forum’s report?

A) Its statistics look embarrassing.

B) It deserves our closest attention.

C) It is invalid in terms of methodology.

D) Its conclusion is purposely exaggerated

还是一样，划出关键词，A中说embarrassing. B中说deserves closest attention。C中说invalid（无效的）。D中说exaggerated，这样一来，就很清楚每个选项的主要内容了。

我所强调的

1，划出关键词

2，定位

3，注意情感词

4，排除

我们开始实战

1， What is the finding of the Global Humanitarian Forum?

A) Rates of death from illnesses have risen due to global warming.

B) Global temperatures affect the rate of economic development.

C) Malnutrition has caused serious health problems in poor countries.

D) Economic trends have to do with population and natural disasters.

（原文）Global warming is causing more than 300,000 deaths and about $125 billion in economic losses each year, according to a report by the Global Humanitarian Forum, an organization led by K o f i A n na n, the former United Nations secretary general.The report, to be released Friday, analyzed data and existing studies of health, disaster, population and economic trends. It found that human-influenced climate change was raising the global death rates from illnesses including malnutrition (营养不良) and heat-related health problems.（解析：读题，找关键词：finding ，Global Humanitarian Forum，关键词找到，我们立刻在文章中定位，为了方面大家看，我已经定位好了，而且找到关键词所在的句子：Global warming is causing more than 300,000 deaths and about $125 billion in economic losses each year, according to a report by the Global Humanitarian Forum，这句一目了然，就知道造成了大量伤亡，再根据下面这句话：It found that human-influenced climate change was raising the global death rates from illnesses including malnutrition，我们就可以确定答案肯定是A）

2，What do we learn about the Forum’s report from the passage?

A) It caused a big stir in developing countries.

B) It was warmly received by environmentalists.

C) It aroused a lot of interest in the scientific circles.

D) It was challenged by some climate and risk experts.

第三段（原文：But even before its release, the report drew criticism from some experts on climate and risk, who questioned its methods and conclusions.）（解析：读题，找关键词：Forum’s report，题目中说我们可以通过这个人的报道知道什么，我们立刻在文章中找到这个人，和他的报道：But even before its release, the report drew criticism from some experts on climate and risk, who questioned its methods and conclusions，我们在看到一些转折词的时候，像 but ，however，although 这类词的时候，一定要特别注意，这个词后面就会是答案，原文说the report drew criticism from some experts on climate and risk，我们再看看选项，只有D肯定是对的了，当然了，其他可以很快排除的，我这里就不多说了）

注：这里要做一点说明

1，基本是每个段落对应一道题目，当然有的是1~2段对应一道题目，我们做完一题别再往回读，浪费时间，当然也读不出什么东西来，所以建议，不要回读，浪费时间。

2，找关键词，在原文中确定答案区间，只要找到答案区间，那么答案就出来了，不要脱离文章，自己主观臆断，这样肯定出错。

3，关键词最好主+次，这样会更准确的找到。

4，不要离开答案区间

3，What does Dr. Pielke say about the Forum’s report?

A) Its statistics look embarrassing.

B) It deserves our closest attention.

C) It is invalid in terms of methodology.

D) Its conclusion is purposely exaggerated

找关键词， Dr. Pielke ， Forum’s report?，我们立刻确定区间。（原文：Roger Pielke Jr., a political scientist at the University of Colorado, Boulder, who studies disaster trends, said the Forum’s report was “a methodological embarrassment” because there was no way to distinguish deaths or economic losses related to human-driven global warming amid the much larger losses resulting from the growth in populations and economic development in vulnerable (易受伤害的) regions. 解析：我们定位答案区间了，答案肯定就在这段，我们看到这句：who studies disaster trends, said the Forum’s report was “a methodological embarrassment”说“方法尴尬”继续看 because there was no way to distinguish deaths or economic losses，说没方法去区分....,我methodological embarrassment”，我们看选项C： It is invalid in terms of methodology.

方法不可信，所以可以确定选C）

作者: 徐胜 时间: 13-12-4 22:10
下面具体说阅读：
步骤：
（1）扫描题干，划出关键词。Ps：关键词：大写字母，人名，地名，数字，时间（能够迅速回到原文定位）
（2）通读原文，抓住中心。Ps：通读原文：1，文章首段 85%开门见山，15%抛砖引玉。2，其余各段首尾和转折处。  思考：文章讲什么，有没有提到核心概念，作者的大致态度是什么。
（3）仔细审题，返回原文。定位：1，关键词定位  2，自然段界定定位（大致是每1~2段对应一个题目）
（4）重叠选项，得出答案。查看原文，对照选项。
宏观阅读：
（1）任何一篇文章都有一个逻辑主旨（一个态度，主旨）
（2）转转关系。
（3）快速扫描定位
（4）注意把握文章的结构

文章结构：
（1）总—分—总：抓住首末段呼应，等于确定了中心。
（2）问题答案型：问题就是文章的中心，问题就是文章的答案。
（3）开门见山型：第一段亮出中心
（4）花开两朵型：有两个核心概念，文章主要围绕两个核心的区别和联系展开论述。
（5）抛砖引玉型：第一段引子，第二段为中心。

下面是题目中的一些小细节
（1）消减否定，hardly inevitable，双重否定即肯定，evitable
（2）认真读主句，从句略读
（3）注意这些词：rather后面往往重要；while引导从句，从句往往不重要，可略读；however后面为重点；But这类转折词后面要注意，往往就是重点；not  or 翻译为：...不...也不；in the other words，表示与前文并列；这类词很多，注重积累，注意细节，不多说。
（4）注意显示作者感情色彩的词例：obvious，always...用于显示作者喜欢或不喜欢...
（5）符号问题：有2个或多个破折号“——”的，AAA“——”，xxx，“——”BBB，两个破折号之间起解释说明作用，不是主句，主干句是AAA~BBB，先读主干，了解主干，然后在读中间解释说明的句子（略读，达到确定主干意思的作用），就是要直接明确主干，避免句子太长，读不懂。  “:”,冒号的作用，解释说明，可略读。几个“，”一起，例“AAA，xxx，c c c ，BBB”逗号中间的起补充说明作用，可跳读，先找主干，明确大意。 “？”可能引出作者的观点态度，论点，看看作者要表达什么。这类符号阅读时候注意观察，熟练运用了符号，长难句也就变成短句了。还有很多，补充可能不到位，做题时自己注意积累。

作者: 徐胜 时间: 13-12-4 22:10

徐胜发表于 2013-12-4 22:10
下面具体说阅读：
步骤：
（1）扫描题干，划出关键词。Ps：关键词：大写字母，人名，地名，数字，时间（ ...

4，What is Soren Andreasen’s view of the report?
A) Its conclusions are based on carefully collected data.
B) It is vulnerable to criticism if the statistics are closely examined.
C) It will give rise to heated discussions at the Copenhagen conference.
D) Its rough estimates are meant to draw the attention of world leaders.
第六段（原文：However, Soren Andreasen, a social scientist at Dalberg Global Development Partners who supervised （指导）the writing of the report, defended it, saying that it was clear that the numbers were rough estimates. He said the report was aimed at world leaders, who will meet in Copenhagen in December to negotiate a new international climate treaty)(读题，找关键词：Soren Andreasen’s view of the report，（解析：我们立刻在文章中找到这个词的位置，就等于确定了答案区间，He said the report was aimed at world leaders, who will meet in Copenhagen in December to negotiate a new international climate treaty很明显，我们直接可以看出来答案就是D）

作者: wzb_seu007 时间: 14-6-5 16:31
顶一下

欢迎光临 Free考研资料 (http://bbs.freekaoyan.com/)