黄皮书89年真题text1解析有错@！！！！！！！！！！

真题89年Text 1

A scientist once said: “I have concluded that the earth is being visited by intelligently controlled vehicles from outer space.”

If we take this as a reasonable explanation for UFOs (unidentified flying objects), questions immediately come up.

“Why don’t they get in touch with us, then? Why don’t they land right on the White House lawn and declare themselves?” people asked.

四、试题具体分析

11. People who ask the question “Why don’t they get in touch with us... and declare

themselves?” think that ________.

11. 提出“那么他们为什么不和我们联系呢？为什么他们不正好降落到白宫的草坪上然后

自我介绍一下呢？ ” 这些问题的人认为________.

[A] there are no such things as UFOs [A] 不明飞行物这种东西是不存在的

[B] UFOs are visitors from solar system [B] 不明飞行物是来自太阳系的探访者

[C] there’s no reason for UFOs sooner or later [C] 对于不明飞行物的说法迟早会理屈词穷的

[D] we are bound to see UFOs sooner or later [D] 人类迟早会看见不明飞行物的

答案选A，对于C的解释

[C]选项错在no reasons。文章第四到七段给出针对这些问题的解答，所以并非是理屈词穷。

质疑：解析不能排除prople可能认为理屈词穷这一情况，就算与事实相反，因为A可能也和事实相反。

嗯。这个我选的是C。网上都找不到解析。除了黄皮书。我觉得C选项和原文中的“easonable explanation ”存在替换关系。

我能不能说89的不用看嘿嘿

你的意思是，解析上是C为正确答案？额，这个题我也看懂了的说